

Searching in stories... |
Timeline |
Options
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Show the latest entries |
||
Searching in stories... |
Timeline |
The Northrop/McDonnell Douglas YF-23 is an American single-seat, twin-engine stealth fighter prototype and technology demonstrator designed for the United States Air Force (USAF). With Northrop as prime contractor and McDonnell Douglas as partner, the design was a finalist in the USAF's Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) demonstration and validation phase, competing against the Lockheed YF-22 developed by Lockheed, Boeing and General Dynamics. Unofficially nicknamed "Black Widow II", two YF-23 prototypes were built.
The YF-23 was considered stealthier and faster, but less agile than its competitor. After a four-year development and evaluation process, the YF-22 team was announced as the winner in April 1991; its design was developed into the F-22 Raptor, which first flew in 1997 and entered service in 2005. In 2004, Northrop Grumman used the second YF-23 as a display model for a proposed regional bomber, a project dropped when longer-range bombers were preferred. Both prototypes are now museum exhibits.
Concept definition
In the late 1970s, American reconnaissance satellites spotted the new Soviet Su-27 and MiG-29 fighters, which threatened to equal or surpass the F-15 Eagle and F-16 Fighting Falcon. Combined with new Soviet systems such as the Beriev A-50 airborne early warning aircraft and modern surface-to-air missiles, these late Cold War threats led the USAF to begin developing in 1981 a new air superiority fighter able to exploit emerging technologies: composite materials, lightweight alloys, advanced flight-control systems, more powerful engines and stealth.
The ATF request for information was issued in May 1981 under the code name "Senior Sky". In 1983 the ATF System Program Office was formed at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base; air-to-air combat became the primary mission and, as the Air Force became aware of the very low radar cross section (RCS) obtained by "black world" programs such as Have Blue and the F-117, stealth gained much more importance. At first the USAF also required short take-off and landing capability, which implied thrust reversers.
Drawing on its experience with the B-2 Spirit stealth bomber, Northrop studied three concepts: the Agile Maneuverable Fighter, the Ultra Stealth Fighter and the High Stealth Fighter (HSF). By 1985 the HSF had evolved into a configuration recognizably similar to the future YF-23, offering the best balance between stealth and aerodynamic performance. Chief engineer Robert Sandusky and chief scientist Yu Ping Liu, who shaped its curved stealthy surfaces, were key figures of the Northrop team.
Demonstration and validation
The November 1984 Statement of Operational Need called for a fighter with a take-off weight of about 50,000 lb (22,700 kg), combining stealth, supercruise (sustained supersonic flight without afterburner), long range and the ability to operate from short runways. The request for proposal was issued in September 1985 and, following the recommendations of the Packard Commission, the construction of flying prototypes was added in May 1986. The USAF then planned to buy 750 ATFs at a unit cost of 35 million dollars (1985 dollars), while the US Navy, under its Navalized Advanced Tactical Fighter (NATF) program announced in 1988, planned 546 aircraft to replace the F-14 Tomcat.
Proposals were submitted in July 1986 by Lockheed, Boeing, General Dynamics, McDonnell Douglas, Northrop, Grumman and Rockwell. Northrop's submission, Design Proposal DP110, was derived from the HSF. On 31 October 1986, the Lockheed and Northrop proposals were selected as finalists. Each team received a fixed-price contract of 691 million dollars (1985 dollars) and 50 months to build and flight-test two prototypes; the Lockheed aircraft became the YF-22 and the Northrop aircraft the YF-23. In parallel, Pratt & Whitney and General Electric developed the competing YF119 and YF120 engines.
Northrop teamed with McDonnell Douglas, with which it had previously developed the F/A-18 Hornet. The partners invested about 650 million dollars of their own funds, and each engine maker 100 million. Northrop built the aft fuselage and tail surfaces in Hawthorne, California, and carried out final assembly at Edwards Air Force Base, while McDonnell Douglas built the wings and forward fuselage in St. Louis, Missouri. The configuration was frozen in January 1988 as DP117K. By then thrust reversers had been dropped, the take-off weight goal had risen to 60,000 lb (27,200 kg) and the internal missile load had been reduced from eight to six. The prototypes did not carry mission avionics, which were tested in ground laboratories and in a modified BAC One-Eleven flying laboratory.
The YF-23 had an unconventional appearance, with diamond-shaped wings whose leading and trailing edges were both swept 40°, a strongly area-ruled fuselage to reduce wave drag, and two all-moving V-tails canted 50° from the vertical, nicknamed "ruddervators". The tails rotated in opposite directions for pitch and in the same direction for yaw, while roll was controlled by differential deflection of the flaps and ailerons; deflecting the flaps down and the ailerons up on both sides at once acted as an airbrake. Aligning all edges along a few directions concentrated radar reflections into a small number of narrow lobes. The aircraft was statically unstable and relied on a fly-by-wire system, whose control laws were refined on a large simulator and on the Total In-Flight Simulator (TIFS), a modified C-131 Samaritan.
The forward fuselage featured a chined nose whose sharp edges generated vortices to improve handling at high angles of attack. The nose and canopy had continuously curved surfaces designed for low radar signature. The cockpit, placed high near the nose for good visibility, had a centre stick and side throttles, and the in-flight refuelling receptacle was located on the spine of the forward fuselage. The aircraft was built "outside-in", the large composite skins being made before the internal structure. To limit costs, off-the-shelf components were used: F-15 nose wheel, F/A-18 main landing gear parts and F-15E forward cockpit components.
The two engines were housed in separate nacelles with flat upper surfaces, nicknamed "bread loafs", on either side of the fuselage. Their fixed-geometry, trapezoidal inlets fed S-shaped ducts that hid the compressor faces from radar, and porous suction panels in front of each inlet bled off the boundary layer. The nacelles kept the volume originally planned for the abandoned thrust reversers. As on the B-2, the exhaust from the single-expansion ramp nozzles flowed through troughs in the aft deck lined with heat-abating tiles made of "Lamilloy" by Detroit Diesel Allison; transpiration cooled by engine bleed air, they reduced the infrared signature seen from below. Unlike the YF-22, the YF-23 did not use thrust vectoring. A single large weapons bay was located under the fuselage, between the nose gear and the main landing gear.
The first YF-23 (PAV-1, serial number 87-0800), powered by Pratt & Whitney YF119 engines, was painted charcoal gray and nicknamed "Gray Ghost". The second (PAV-2, 87-0801), powered by General Electric YF120 engines, was painted in two shades of gray and nicknamed "Spider". The unofficial name "Black Widow II" came both from the radar cross section plot, which looked like a spider, and from Northrop's World War II P-61 Black Widow night fighter. PAV-1 briefly had a red hourglass painted around its ram air scoop to warn ground crews; resembling the marking under the body of the black widow spider, it was removed at the request of Northrop management.
PAV-1 was rolled out at Edwards Air Force Base on 22 June 1990 and made a 50-minute maiden flight on 27 August 1990, flown by Northrop chief test pilot Alfred "Paul" Metz; the F-16 chase aircraft had to use afterburner to keep up with it during the climb. PAV-2 followed on 26 October 1990 with Jim Sandberg at the controls. On 18 September PAV-1 supercruised at Mach 1.43, and on 29 November PAV-2 exceeded Mach 1.6 without afterburner; the highest supercruise speed reached was Mach 1.72. By comparison, the YF-22 reached Mach 1.58 in supercruise. The two prototypes flew together only once, for a photo session over the Mojave Desert on 29 November 1990.
On 30 November PAV-1 completed a fast-paced combat demonstration of six flights in about ten hours, during which it reached Mach 1.8 in afterburner, its highest recorded speed; the maximum speed remains classified, but is believed to exceed Mach 2 at altitude. The maximum angle of attack tested was 25°. Unlike Lockheed, which fired AIM-9 Sidewinder and AIM-120 AMRAAM missiles from its YF-22, Northrop fired no missiles from the YF-23; its weapons bay was only used for acoustic tests. Flight testing ended in December 1990: the two YF-23s had flown 50 times for a total of 65.2 hours, demonstrating Northrop's predicted performance.
Evaluation
Both designs met or exceeded the performance requirements; the YF-23 was stealthier and faster, but the YF-22 was more agile. On 23 April 1991, Secretary of the Air Force Donald Rice announced that the Lockheed team and Pratt & Whitney had won the airframe and engine competitions. The Lockheed proposal was judged to offer better technical features, lower risk (the YF-23 had flown far fewer sorties and hours) and more effective program management. Aviation observers also suggested that Northrop's cost overruns and delays on the B-2 and AGM-137 TSSAM programs counted against it. Some press reports added that the Lockheed design was considered more easily adaptable to the Navy's NATF requirement, although the Navy abandoned the NATF program by fiscal year 1992 because of rising costs.
After the competition, both YF-23s were transferred without engines to NASA's Dryden Flight Research Center at Edwards Air Force Base. NASA planned to use one of them for load calibration research, but this never happened. The two airframes remained in storage until mid-1996 and were then transferred to museums.
In 2004, Northrop Grumman proposed a YF-23-based bomber, the FB-23 "Rapid Theater Attack", for the USAF's interim regional bomber requirement, against the Lockheed Martin FB-22 and the Boeing B-1R. PAV-2 was modified as a display model for the proposal. The 2006 Quadrennial Defense Review favoured a long-range strategic bomber instead, which ended the project. In 2018 there was speculation that Northrop Grumman might offer a modernized F-23 for Japan's F-X fighter program, but Japan did not pursue it.
— — — = = — — —
— — — = = — — —
|
|
You choosed to show only the famous things! (Via the Options menu)
The comments below concern only this page (YF-23 Black Widow II).
For a general question or remark about aircraftube, please use the general blog.